August 17th, 2005 |
03:33 pm |
Posted in
General
|
5 Comments
At the WELS Conference of Worship, Music, and the Arts I attended a presentation by Rev. James Tiefel from the WELS Seminary in Mequon (he teaches worship and homiletics) on blended worship. I must first say that I have a lot of respect for Prof. Tiefel after attending this conference. I have known him to personally prefer high church stuff, but he readily admitted that although he may not like some of the changes in the liturgy, that doesn’t mean they are bad. I really like a liturgical Lutheran who can admit that.
Tiefel pointed out that we have a wide range of musical styles today that Luther didn’t have. Luther basically had two choices: Gregorian chant or European folk style. Tiefel pointed out that today you can find settings of the Ordinary in almost every musical style known today. Some are good, some not as good, but that doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing. He also pointed out that there is no sin in being a non-liturgical church and that the liturgy can be simplified and still retain its strengths. Wonder how much courage it took for him to admit that!
Tiefel also made a strong distinction between blended worship and contemporary worship: Blended worship retains the theological strengths of the Christian rite, maintains traditional Lutheran hymnody and the Lutheran musical heritage, enriches the Church’s worship experience, expands the Church’s worship vision, and carries the Church’s worship to a new era in which others will add their styles in blended magnificence. And just to expand on this definition a little bit, blended worship is NOT the contemporary worship style in the Methobapticostal/Evangelical sense. The music being introduced in the WELS doesn’t come close to the feel good, meatless praise and worship music heard in Evangelical churches.
One interesting observation he made, which in my short time in the Lutheran blogosphere I have experienced first-hand, is that the LCMS seems to have the attitude that if you’re liturgical, then you’re confessional. If you’re not liturgical, then you’re not confessional. The WELS won’t take that attitude, Tiefel said, and I am grateful to be WELS. I am definitely NOT liturgical and definitely AM confessional.
There’s a lot more that I can add in looking over my notes, but that was the important stuff. I’m glad he’s teaching our sem guys worship!